Exam result oriented teaching is basically a concept whereby the trainer understands the examination contents really well and takes the students through the coursework, all the whilst holding his/her attention around the idea that the only real target is to make it possible for the individual to obtain superb marks on the examination itself , irregardless of the curriculum contents.
Whilst there exists no disagreeing that this educating strategy achieves the goal of making sure the great bulk of students will score very well at the examinations, one have to question again - is this the right technique to teach our small children?
In reality, the system that comes with an examination outcome oriented strategy of teaching is creating a unrealistic condition of "easy testing." This can cause a pupil who transfers from this academic institution and into one where a far more traditional approach is practiced to flunk miserably because there exists no longer an exceptionally clear and concise knowing of exactly what to expect when it comes time for tests.
Similarly, when a pupil graduates right from high school and makes its way into university, should they happen to attend a college, or maybe a course, where examination result oriented teaching just isn't the common approach, they're going to find it inevitably far more tough to show good results in that testing environment. Nonetheless, in addition to immersing in an exams-oriented teaching environment, learners can implement ways to perform well in exams.
Examination grades driven teaching brings about a unrealistic sense of security as well as confidence in life itself. A pupil that has been put through an examination result oriented training isn't going to realize how to rebound after they have a misstep on an examination; nor do these people understand how to study intensely for any "unknown" of not being able to assert with certainty they undoubtedly know all the answers to all of the queries in life - er - to each of the problems which will be on the exam.
Although the pros are heavily weighted to the good to the college; for retention of critical funding and to the overall ease of a cookie-cutter curriculum that turns into stale and repeatable, the cons are much additional ominous for our children who're not understanding the invaluable skills of how to study on their own, or ways to study diligently for anything they want or need to attain.
When these kids enter the workforce and the real world they might find that the utopia they are used to, this overall perception of entitlement, brings with it a nasty epiphany that world is not equitable. That life just isn't easy. And regrettably, that they are ill-prepared.
This could possibly lead to depression, confusion, in addition to despair. This could cause an otherwise ordinary pupil to function sub-par in their jobs, and hence make a lifelong path of underachieving; only because they were never made clear to during their formative time how to work hard to obtain what they really want, instead of having everything basically handed down to them.
Nevertheless, it is also likely that the self-assurance that was instilled by a somewhat "straightforward" education method will help to give a young adult the self-confidence to be successful in tougher situations. When presented with an unknown variable, they will feel assured that they can tackle it with grace and ease, for the reason that - after all - they have constantly been in a position to perform so.
For that reason, as soon as they enter into the workforce and society as an grownup, they're a go-getter, because they know they're now able to succeed. It's been a proven truth of their whole life up to their adult years that they carry with them during every single challenge they encounter in life.
The jury may very well be out to the actual impact to society of examination result oriented teaching, nonetheless it is clear that we are teaching our youngsters a lesson - regardless of whether it's a positive lesson or perhaps a damaging lesson might not yet still be crystal clear.
Whilst there exists no disagreeing that this educating strategy achieves the goal of making sure the great bulk of students will score very well at the examinations, one have to question again - is this the right technique to teach our small children?
In reality, the system that comes with an examination outcome oriented strategy of teaching is creating a unrealistic condition of "easy testing." This can cause a pupil who transfers from this academic institution and into one where a far more traditional approach is practiced to flunk miserably because there exists no longer an exceptionally clear and concise knowing of exactly what to expect when it comes time for tests.
Similarly, when a pupil graduates right from high school and makes its way into university, should they happen to attend a college, or maybe a course, where examination result oriented teaching just isn't the common approach, they're going to find it inevitably far more tough to show good results in that testing environment. Nonetheless, in addition to immersing in an exams-oriented teaching environment, learners can implement ways to perform well in exams.
Examination grades driven teaching brings about a unrealistic sense of security as well as confidence in life itself. A pupil that has been put through an examination result oriented training isn't going to realize how to rebound after they have a misstep on an examination; nor do these people understand how to study intensely for any "unknown" of not being able to assert with certainty they undoubtedly know all the answers to all of the queries in life - er - to each of the problems which will be on the exam.
Although the pros are heavily weighted to the good to the college; for retention of critical funding and to the overall ease of a cookie-cutter curriculum that turns into stale and repeatable, the cons are much additional ominous for our children who're not understanding the invaluable skills of how to study on their own, or ways to study diligently for anything they want or need to attain.
When these kids enter the workforce and the real world they might find that the utopia they are used to, this overall perception of entitlement, brings with it a nasty epiphany that world is not equitable. That life just isn't easy. And regrettably, that they are ill-prepared.
This could possibly lead to depression, confusion, in addition to despair. This could cause an otherwise ordinary pupil to function sub-par in their jobs, and hence make a lifelong path of underachieving; only because they were never made clear to during their formative time how to work hard to obtain what they really want, instead of having everything basically handed down to them.
Nevertheless, it is also likely that the self-assurance that was instilled by a somewhat "straightforward" education method will help to give a young adult the self-confidence to be successful in tougher situations. When presented with an unknown variable, they will feel assured that they can tackle it with grace and ease, for the reason that - after all - they have constantly been in a position to perform so.
For that reason, as soon as they enter into the workforce and society as an grownup, they're a go-getter, because they know they're now able to succeed. It's been a proven truth of their whole life up to their adult years that they carry with them during every single challenge they encounter in life.
The jury may very well be out to the actual impact to society of examination result oriented teaching, nonetheless it is clear that we are teaching our youngsters a lesson - regardless of whether it's a positive lesson or perhaps a damaging lesson might not yet still be crystal clear.
About the Author:
The author has been teaching for the last 5 years in Singapore, an exams grades oriented country. she gives reviews often in her blog on taking exams such as O levels and PSLE in Singapore.
No comments:
Post a Comment