A whistleblower, also written as a whistle blower or whistle-blower refers to an individual who exposes information or activity. The activity or information can be of any kind and is deemed unethical, illegal, or not right within a public or private organization. Whistle-blowers often face some kind of retaliation from the organizations they expose, and they may need to seek protection or flee. To know more about a whistleblower San Bernardino CA is the place to consider visiting.
The word whistleblower derives from the whistle used in games by referees when signaling illegal or foul play. The coining of the term occurred in the 1970s by someone known as Ralph Nader. The term was coined in a bid to alleviate the negative connotations associated with the practice when referred to using words like snitch and informer.
There are many ways of classifying information of alleged wrongdoing. Some of these ways include violation of company policy, regulation or law, threat to public interest, threat to national security, corruption, and fraud. The allegations of wrongdoing can be brought to the surface either internally or externally. Most whistle-blowers can be classified as internal whistle-blowers. That means that they report the information on wrongdoing to their superiors or fellow employees within the organization.
Systems for reporting misconduct exist in most organizations. According to research, efficiency is higher in systems where whistleblowers have a choice of options. It is much better that the individual remains anonymous after making the report. Because of lack of retaliation, anonymous reporting mechanisms encourage workers to report misconduct when they see it.
External whistle-blowers are the second category of whistle-blowers. These ones report the information they have regarding misdoings to third parties, that is, persons or entities. The third party is usually not a person within the same organization. The choice of the third party to report to usually depends on the nature and severity of the misconduct. Some of the most common third parties external whistle-blowers contact includes watchdog agencies, law enforcement agencies, the media, and lawyers.
Conventional methods of whistleblowing have seen an increase in cases of retaliation against whistleblowers. That has led to the invention of a third method to report misconduct. In this third method, misconduct is reported to the top management of the organization through a third party, without the identity of the whistle-blower being revealed. The International Whistleblowers organization is an example of international organizations that offer such services.
Whistle blowers are often offered legal protection in most countries. The legal protection varies from one country to another and is dependent on many factors. Some of the factors that affect legal protection include country of original activity, how secrets were revealed, where secrets were revealed, and how misconduct finally become public knowledge.
Whistleblowing is not an easy thing to do because it takes a lot of courage and bravery because most people usually fear the associated retaliation. It is almost hard to name all possible negative consequences. However, the major consequences include isolation, broken promises, social stigmatization, humiliation, formal reprimand, disillusionment, difficult court proceedings, and assassination of character among others.
The word whistleblower derives from the whistle used in games by referees when signaling illegal or foul play. The coining of the term occurred in the 1970s by someone known as Ralph Nader. The term was coined in a bid to alleviate the negative connotations associated with the practice when referred to using words like snitch and informer.
There are many ways of classifying information of alleged wrongdoing. Some of these ways include violation of company policy, regulation or law, threat to public interest, threat to national security, corruption, and fraud. The allegations of wrongdoing can be brought to the surface either internally or externally. Most whistle-blowers can be classified as internal whistle-blowers. That means that they report the information on wrongdoing to their superiors or fellow employees within the organization.
Systems for reporting misconduct exist in most organizations. According to research, efficiency is higher in systems where whistleblowers have a choice of options. It is much better that the individual remains anonymous after making the report. Because of lack of retaliation, anonymous reporting mechanisms encourage workers to report misconduct when they see it.
External whistle-blowers are the second category of whistle-blowers. These ones report the information they have regarding misdoings to third parties, that is, persons or entities. The third party is usually not a person within the same organization. The choice of the third party to report to usually depends on the nature and severity of the misconduct. Some of the most common third parties external whistle-blowers contact includes watchdog agencies, law enforcement agencies, the media, and lawyers.
Conventional methods of whistleblowing have seen an increase in cases of retaliation against whistleblowers. That has led to the invention of a third method to report misconduct. In this third method, misconduct is reported to the top management of the organization through a third party, without the identity of the whistle-blower being revealed. The International Whistleblowers organization is an example of international organizations that offer such services.
Whistle blowers are often offered legal protection in most countries. The legal protection varies from one country to another and is dependent on many factors. Some of the factors that affect legal protection include country of original activity, how secrets were revealed, where secrets were revealed, and how misconduct finally become public knowledge.
Whistleblowing is not an easy thing to do because it takes a lot of courage and bravery because most people usually fear the associated retaliation. It is almost hard to name all possible negative consequences. However, the major consequences include isolation, broken promises, social stigmatization, humiliation, formal reprimand, disillusionment, difficult court proceedings, and assassination of character among others.
About the Author:
If you are looking for the facts about a whistleblower San Bernardino CA locals can come to our web pages here today. Additional details are available at http://www.skassellaw.com now.
No comments:
Post a Comment