Different scientists and theologians have over the years come up with theories in favor of or against organisms evolving. With every side sticking to their argument, the debate on the beginning of the existence of life is far from over. There are very strong arguments against evolution that try to dent into the belief that life started spontaneously. If the theory was to hold some water, it would have to explain the origin of the sun and the earth, the origin of all other living creatures and where the first self- replicating cells came from.
Living things can never arise from non living things. This fact is clear even from science. With evolutionists, there is requirement of non-living organisms to turn into living things, something that has never and can never be observed. This is what would be called the principle of bio-genesis in biology. Evolutionists are of the claim that life began from non-living things, which they have never proved.
Literally all theories on this theory have missing links. These links would offer the most important insight into such theories. However, such links are still missing and details about them are yet to be clear. There would have been numerous intermediate fossil organisms in fossil records if the theories held any water. The majority of details by evolutionists is inferred and reliant on the laws of probability, both scientific and mathematical.
The science and mathematics of probability favors not the theory of evolution either. There is not a chance that one protein molecule that contains two hundred amino acids can arise spontaneously. Even if there were amino acids on the entire face of the world and they were able to combine frantically over many years, still there would be no production of any life. The over two million proteins in the human body could not have been formed by chance.
It is not possible that the universe created itself. This is contrary to the belief of scientists like Steven Hawking that with the force of gravity, it is possible that the universe created itself from nothing. With evolution, there are no clear details on where the entire universe came from; the details given are scarcely believable. According to the laws of thermodynamics, there has to be a beginning of the universe. If the universe existed from the beginning, it is possible that the entire energy available would have gotten finished.
Mutations contravene evolutionary theory. Natural selection is not able to bring about any new genetic materials. Indiscriminate changes that occur in the genetic makeup of an organism are known as mutations. Those that believe in evolution say that it is through mutations that new genes that facilitate evolutionary processes are supplied. On the contrary, mutations are simply scientific modifications of cells to be able to survive under new conditions. It has nothing to do with evolution.
The emphasis on vestigial organs by the evolutionary theory is misleading in a big way. Simply because an organ is not being used in the body does not imply it is useless. Organs do not qualify as vestigial depending on the need of individuals.
The arguments against evolution are valid. There is not enough information to believe in evolutionary processes. Creation remains largely believable.
Living things can never arise from non living things. This fact is clear even from science. With evolutionists, there is requirement of non-living organisms to turn into living things, something that has never and can never be observed. This is what would be called the principle of bio-genesis in biology. Evolutionists are of the claim that life began from non-living things, which they have never proved.
Literally all theories on this theory have missing links. These links would offer the most important insight into such theories. However, such links are still missing and details about them are yet to be clear. There would have been numerous intermediate fossil organisms in fossil records if the theories held any water. The majority of details by evolutionists is inferred and reliant on the laws of probability, both scientific and mathematical.
The science and mathematics of probability favors not the theory of evolution either. There is not a chance that one protein molecule that contains two hundred amino acids can arise spontaneously. Even if there were amino acids on the entire face of the world and they were able to combine frantically over many years, still there would be no production of any life. The over two million proteins in the human body could not have been formed by chance.
It is not possible that the universe created itself. This is contrary to the belief of scientists like Steven Hawking that with the force of gravity, it is possible that the universe created itself from nothing. With evolution, there are no clear details on where the entire universe came from; the details given are scarcely believable. According to the laws of thermodynamics, there has to be a beginning of the universe. If the universe existed from the beginning, it is possible that the entire energy available would have gotten finished.
Mutations contravene evolutionary theory. Natural selection is not able to bring about any new genetic materials. Indiscriminate changes that occur in the genetic makeup of an organism are known as mutations. Those that believe in evolution say that it is through mutations that new genes that facilitate evolutionary processes are supplied. On the contrary, mutations are simply scientific modifications of cells to be able to survive under new conditions. It has nothing to do with evolution.
The emphasis on vestigial organs by the evolutionary theory is misleading in a big way. Simply because an organ is not being used in the body does not imply it is useless. Organs do not qualify as vestigial depending on the need of individuals.
The arguments against evolution are valid. There is not enough information to believe in evolutionary processes. Creation remains largely believable.
No comments:
Post a Comment