The last thing that passengers expected at Los Angeles airport last week was a gunman randomly shooting up the place. But where can safety be found when not even little children are safe in their classrooms at school or an audience in a movie theater? Where is sanity when politicians refuse to allow gun laws to stop the horrendous violence? Where is common sense when a large portion of the population thinks it is better to allow gun ownership for everyone than to call a halt to the incredible situation that now exists?
Let's now look at some statistical figures. There are an estimated 70 million handguns privately owned handguns in the United States that are used for self-defense, hunting, sharpshooting, and other legitimate purposes. Since Washington enacted a ban on handguns, homicide rates rose to 200%. Switzerland, where at least one in every three of its less than eight million inhabitants owns a gun, has one of the lowest crime rates in the world.
If they are to protect people from crime, or the drug cartels, then why were they simultaneously selling guns to them on the side? Could it be that the government isn't trying to protect the American People, rather protect themselves? I find this a bit troubling because it is the taxpayer's money they are using.
Like I specified there are numerous states where you legitimately can't claim one and on top of that there are certain urban communities where it is lawful besides. There are additionally several states where you can claim one however there is lawful formality to overcome for example getting a license.
Recent mass shootings have understandingly stirred up emotions in people. Hopefully, they bothered you too. However, even as gun ownership reforms are being introduced, the very people pushing for new regulations are already admitting that the rules would not have stopped any of the shootings. It is unfortunate that dead children are being as used as human shields in order to push forward political agendas.
As the gun control debate gets heated up after 20 school children died, the laws which we adhere to most conscientiously must be re-looked and challenged pragmatically. India is the country with one of the strictest firearm regulations in the world. It is, however also the country where a rape is reported every 20 minutes!
National tragedies need to be addressed but asking criminals and unstable people to complete and file government forms will not stop gun violence. Gun crimes are ultimately about mental capacity, not magazine capacity, and firearm regulations rarely address the true issue.
The government can steal for you, so you don't need to use your gun to take the property of another through proxy. So, as you can you see you don't really need a gun. If you did, you would be issued one by the government because they know what's best.
So, if the new firearm regulations cause you to take action and make a firearms purchase and get some extra ammunition more quickly, then that will be good for you. However, don't let it all distract you from job one: getting food and other supplies readied.
Let's now look at some statistical figures. There are an estimated 70 million handguns privately owned handguns in the United States that are used for self-defense, hunting, sharpshooting, and other legitimate purposes. Since Washington enacted a ban on handguns, homicide rates rose to 200%. Switzerland, where at least one in every three of its less than eight million inhabitants owns a gun, has one of the lowest crime rates in the world.
If they are to protect people from crime, or the drug cartels, then why were they simultaneously selling guns to them on the side? Could it be that the government isn't trying to protect the American People, rather protect themselves? I find this a bit troubling because it is the taxpayer's money they are using.
Like I specified there are numerous states where you legitimately can't claim one and on top of that there are certain urban communities where it is lawful besides. There are additionally several states where you can claim one however there is lawful formality to overcome for example getting a license.
Recent mass shootings have understandingly stirred up emotions in people. Hopefully, they bothered you too. However, even as gun ownership reforms are being introduced, the very people pushing for new regulations are already admitting that the rules would not have stopped any of the shootings. It is unfortunate that dead children are being as used as human shields in order to push forward political agendas.
As the gun control debate gets heated up after 20 school children died, the laws which we adhere to most conscientiously must be re-looked and challenged pragmatically. India is the country with one of the strictest firearm regulations in the world. It is, however also the country where a rape is reported every 20 minutes!
National tragedies need to be addressed but asking criminals and unstable people to complete and file government forms will not stop gun violence. Gun crimes are ultimately about mental capacity, not magazine capacity, and firearm regulations rarely address the true issue.
The government can steal for you, so you don't need to use your gun to take the property of another through proxy. So, as you can you see you don't really need a gun. If you did, you would be issued one by the government because they know what's best.
So, if the new firearm regulations cause you to take action and make a firearms purchase and get some extra ammunition more quickly, then that will be good for you. However, don't let it all distract you from job one: getting food and other supplies readied.
About the Author:
Purchase books on American gun laws online right now! Visit our virtual store to view our complete selection of law books at http://bookvalueusa.com today.
No comments:
Post a Comment