My son is a Marine in Iraq proper now and I am in the Air Pressure Reserve. I have been a cop for around eighteen several years. I use entire body armor each day. About the several years the only time I have worn the greatest armor on the market place is when I paid out for it myself. Each time the Federal government troubles it, we get issued armor that is sub standard to the latest Know-how. We can in no way seem to be to uncover out who can make the ultimate decision on what we last but not least are issued. Odd is not it.
I as very well as my son have been issued the Interceptor Armor, which blows my intellect given that for a few of decades now everybody has recognized the superiority of Pinnacle's Dragon pores and skin. My son is receiving shot at with Ak47's, and seven.sixty two form rounds. The complete vest ought to cease these rounds not just exactly where the added SAPI plates are. The current Interceptor except hit in the SAPI plates only stops a 9mm round. I want my son to be wearing the finest and almost nothing a lot less.
Helmets are also getting created with far better ballistics and suspension techniques that minimize the concussion pressures from blasts and impacts. Why do we problem the upcoming very best thing? Since the idiots who are in charge really don't have to dress in it and somebody is creating a Buck.
The Army Intelligence contemplating is not to enable soldiers to acquire their individual system armor BUT let after market armor to be additional to gentle skinned vehicles. In 2005,I noticed plywood walls filled with sandbags stacked three to four ft over the center of gravity and overloading the steering gear. How quite a few folks died in simple vehicle rollovers caused by immediately after market armor vs. people today that died from privately owned physique armor?
As if this is a thing that was not getting told to the military before. Why does it just take so very long to "check out" this kind of a high priority condition as this? My finest guess is that the contractors of DOD components pull a lot of "political strings" to maintain supplying inferior merchandise at the cost of soldier's lives. Do a search on "dragon pores and skin" the following on M.Do and you will see quite a few preceding content articles on the army producing soldiers drop their DS armor for the significantly less efficient crap they ended up supplying. Adhere to the dollars and as Morpheus said, "The fact will set you no cost."
Effectively, I am not positive if you are pointing your finger at the suitable entity here.
MI does not make coverage pertaining to paying for Privately Owned Armor. I am contemplating that this issue goes greater up the foods chain. Now, if you are talking about distinct MI units not allowing these purchases, then I can realize where you are coming from.
And indeed, I have viewed domestically produced armor (like the plywood contraption you are speaking about), but that is not soon after market armor, it is regionally created armor. Following Industry Armor are off the shelf, commonly offered armor that has been tested and does/or does not move MIL Spec requirements.
Getting crappy armor is a leadership situation. If your leaders are likely to sit there and permit us to go to war without having the suitable gear, then it is a really serious lack of leadership on the portion of folks who are compensated to make individuals decisions, but alternatively are nurturing their careers and waiting for that retirement check out.
Really don't rock the boat you know.
I guess I am in a quite cool Guard unit (whole lot of LE in it). And my leadership will not avoid me from employing the best products available. I am not likely to theater actually once again with crappy armor.
I started out with the Flak Jacket (about safety amount for rounds), bought an interceptor vest from a crooked Energetic Duty soldier (since we have been not obtaining ours issued), place untested Iraqi Plates, purchased some Israeli manufactured kinds and then, got some stand alone degree IV from a Canadian manufacturer.
Next time I deploy, I am taking Dragon Skin, no issue what anyone says. I can consider the court martial, but I are unable to just take the pine box.
I as very well as my son have been issued the Interceptor Armor, which blows my intellect given that for a few of decades now everybody has recognized the superiority of Pinnacle's Dragon pores and skin. My son is receiving shot at with Ak47's, and seven.sixty two form rounds. The complete vest ought to cease these rounds not just exactly where the added SAPI plates are. The current Interceptor except hit in the SAPI plates only stops a 9mm round. I want my son to be wearing the finest and almost nothing a lot less.
Helmets are also getting created with far better ballistics and suspension techniques that minimize the concussion pressures from blasts and impacts. Why do we problem the upcoming very best thing? Since the idiots who are in charge really don't have to dress in it and somebody is creating a Buck.
The Army Intelligence contemplating is not to enable soldiers to acquire their individual system armor BUT let after market armor to be additional to gentle skinned vehicles. In 2005,I noticed plywood walls filled with sandbags stacked three to four ft over the center of gravity and overloading the steering gear. How quite a few folks died in simple vehicle rollovers caused by immediately after market armor vs. people today that died from privately owned physique armor?
As if this is a thing that was not getting told to the military before. Why does it just take so very long to "check out" this kind of a high priority condition as this? My finest guess is that the contractors of DOD components pull a lot of "political strings" to maintain supplying inferior merchandise at the cost of soldier's lives. Do a search on "dragon pores and skin" the following on M.Do and you will see quite a few preceding content articles on the army producing soldiers drop their DS armor for the significantly less efficient crap they ended up supplying. Adhere to the dollars and as Morpheus said, "The fact will set you no cost."
Effectively, I am not positive if you are pointing your finger at the suitable entity here.
MI does not make coverage pertaining to paying for Privately Owned Armor. I am contemplating that this issue goes greater up the foods chain. Now, if you are talking about distinct MI units not allowing these purchases, then I can realize where you are coming from.
And indeed, I have viewed domestically produced armor (like the plywood contraption you are speaking about), but that is not soon after market armor, it is regionally created armor. Following Industry Armor are off the shelf, commonly offered armor that has been tested and does/or does not move MIL Spec requirements.
Getting crappy armor is a leadership situation. If your leaders are likely to sit there and permit us to go to war without having the suitable gear, then it is a really serious lack of leadership on the portion of folks who are compensated to make individuals decisions, but alternatively are nurturing their careers and waiting for that retirement check out.
Really don't rock the boat you know.
I guess I am in a quite cool Guard unit (whole lot of LE in it). And my leadership will not avoid me from employing the best products available. I am not likely to theater actually once again with crappy armor.
I started out with the Flak Jacket (about safety amount for rounds), bought an interceptor vest from a crooked Energetic Duty soldier (since we have been not obtaining ours issued), place untested Iraqi Plates, purchased some Israeli manufactured kinds and then, got some stand alone degree IV from a Canadian manufacturer.
Next time I deploy, I am taking Dragon Skin, no issue what anyone says. I can consider the court martial, but I are unable to just take the pine box.
About the Author:
Discover more valuable strategies of Sapi Plates and Sapi Plates for Sale on my own webpage.
No comments:
Post a Comment